Possibly wrong standard naming in section about "ANSI-join" #4
Description
Section "Try to use ANSI-join syntax”.
The text suggests that the bad example is not ANSI. As far as I know it is ANSI, ANSI-89 to be precise. The good example is ANSI-92.
__
I refer to the pdf, commit cf4d9b0; however, I guess it's true for the doc as well.