Skip to content

Update eslint npm packages (major) #6473

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Update eslint npm packages (major) #6473

wants to merge 1 commit into from
+535 −157

Conversation

hash-worker[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@hash-worker hash-worker bot commented Feb 17, 2025 •
edited
Loading

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
@​types/eslint__eslintrc 2.1.2 -> 3.3.0 age confidence
eslint-config-sheriff (source) 25.8.1 -> 28.1.0 age confidence
eslint-import-resolver-typescript 3.8.1 -> 4.4.4 age confidence
eslint-plugin-storybook (source) 0.11.3 -> 9.0.18 age confidence

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

Release Notes

AndreaPontrandolfo/sheriff (eslint-config-sheriff)

v28.1.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • eaa727f: fix(config): removed 'no-unassigned-vars'
    fix(cli): updated deps, fixed typos
    fix(create): updated deps, fixed typos

v28.0.0

Compare Source

Major Changes
  • e64b713: feat(config): added no-unassigned-vars and react-you-might-not-need-an-effect
Minor Changes
  • a418973: feat: bumped some deps
  • e14e7b8: feat(deps): updated and pinned eslint-plugin-remeda. Fixes #​393
Patch Changes
  • dcea3f8: AndreaPontrandolfo/issue401
    bump

v27.1.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • bcb1abd: fix(config): update Storybook config condition to be enabled if not specified otherwise
    fix(cli): fixed a bug with @​sherifforg/cli
    feat(deps): updated some deps

v27.0.0

Compare Source

Major Changes
Minor Changes
  • d83fe89: feat(config): Move Storybook support behind an option
    Fixes #​355

v26.0.0

Compare Source

Major Changes
  • cd80b61: feat(config): Implemented eslint-no-restricted
    Closes #​375
import-js/eslint-import-resolver-typescript (eslint-import-resolver-typescript)

v4.4.4

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v4.4.3

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v4.4.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v4.4.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v4.4.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

v4.3.5

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v4.3.4

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v4.3.3

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v4.3.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v4.3.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v4.3.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

v4.2.7

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v4.2.6

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v4.2.5

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v4.2.4

Compare Source

Patch Changes

  • #​407 6b183ff Thanks @​JounQin! - chore: migrate to rebranding unrs-resolver with new targets supported:

    • i686-pc-windows-msvc
    • armv7-unknown-linux-musleabihf
    • powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu
    • s390x-unknown-linux-gnu

v4.2.3

Compare Source

Patch Changes

  • #​402 f21bf15 Thanks @​SunsetTechuila! - fix: don't resolve not implemented node modules in bun

    is-bun-module is marked as dependency, again, for correctness, see isBunImplementedNodeModule for more details

    For Bun users: you don't need to install is-bun-module any more but bun: true option is still required if you're running without bun --bun nor run#bun enabled

v4.2.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes

  • #​397 14a7688 Thanks @​JounQin! - chore: bump rspack-resolver for better P'n'P support

    Now rspack-resolver resolves pnpapi natively.

v4.2.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v4.2.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

  • #​391 c8121e5 Thanks @​JounQin! - feat: make is-bun-module as optional peer dependency

    Technically this is a BREAKING CHANGE, but considering we just raise out v4 recently and this only affects bun users, bun --bun eslint even works without this dependency, so I'd consider this as a minor change.

    So for bun users, there are three options:

    1. install is-bun-module dependency manually and use bun: true option
    2. run eslint with bun --bun eslint w/o bun: true option
    3. enable run#bun in bunfig.toml w/o bun: true option

v4.1.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v4.1.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

  • #​387 ef5cd10 Thanks @​JounQin! - feat: add a new bun?: boolean option for bun users - close #​386

    process.versions.bun is unavailable even with bun eslint due to its own design,
    but checking bun modules for non-bun users is incorrect behavior and just wasting time,
    so a new option is added for such case, you can still run with bun --bun eslint without this option enabled

v4.0.0

Compare Source

Major Changes

  • #​368 2fd7c2e Thanks @​JounQin! - feat!: rewrite, speed up by using rspack-resolver which supports references natively under the hood

    BREAKING CHANGES:

    • drop Node 14 support, Node ^16.17.0 || >=18.6 is now required
    • alwaysTryTypes is enabled by default, you can set it as false to opt-out
    • array type of project is discouraged but still supported, single project with references are encouraged for better performance, you can enable noWarnOnMultipleProjects option to supress the warning message
    • root tsconfig.json or jsconfig.json will be used automatically if no project provided

v3.10.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

Full Changelog: import-js/eslint-import-resolver-typescript@v3.10.0...v3.10.1

v3.10.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

Full Changelog: import-js/eslint-import-resolver-typescript@v3.9.1...v3.10.0

v3.9.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v3.9.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

v3.8.7

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v3.8.6

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v3.8.5

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v3.8.4

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v3.8.3

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v3.8.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes
storybookjs/storybook (eslint-plugin-storybook)

v9.0.18

Compare Source

v9.0.17

Compare Source

v9.0.16

Compare Source

v9.0.15

Compare Source

v9.0.14

Compare Source

v9.0.13

Compare Source

v9.0.12

Compare Source

v9.0.11

Compare Source

v9.0.10

Compare Source

v9.0.9

Compare Source

v9.0.8

Compare Source

[!NOTE]
Version 9.0.7 was skipped because of a bad release of eslint-plugin-storybook.

v9.0.7

Compare Source

v9.0.6

Compare Source

v9.0.5

Compare Source

v9.0.4

Compare Source

v9.0.3

Compare Source

v9.0.2

Compare Source

v9.0.1

Compare Source

v9.0.0

Compare Source

Storybook 9.0 is here

This is a huge release focused on testing and bundle size.

  • Component testing
    • 👆 Interactions
    • ♿️ Accessibility
    • 👁️ Visual changes
    • 🛡️ Coverage
  • 🪶 48% lighter bundle
  • 🏷️ Tags-based organization
  • 🌐 Story globals
  • 🏗️ Major upgrades: Svelte, Next, React Native, Angular

Please checkout our Migration guide to upgrade from earlier versions of Storybook. To see a comprehensive list of changes that went into 9.0, you can refer to the 9.0 prerelease changelogs

List of all updates

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.

  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@hash-worker hash-worker bot enabled auto-merge February 17, 2025 23:13
hashdotai
hashdotai previously approved these changes Feb 17, 2025
View reviewed changes
@github-actions github-actions bot added area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) type/eng > backend Owned by the @backend team labels Feb 17, 2025
@hash-worker hash-worker bot force-pushed the deps/js/major-eslint-npm-packages branch from ac259a8 to d2680e8 Compare February 18, 2025 08:12
@hash-worker hash-worker bot force-pushed the deps/js/major-eslint-npm-packages branch from d2680e8 to 720eb2d Compare March 4, 2025 12:50
@hash-worker hash-worker bot changed the title Update npm package eslint-config-sheriff to v26 Update eslint npm packages (major) Mar 4, 2025
hashdotai
hashdotai previously approved these changes Mar 4, 2025
View reviewed changes
@hash-worker hash-worker bot force-pushed the deps/js/major-eslint-npm-packages branch from 720eb2d to fb88e42 Compare March 5, 2025 01:41
@hash-worker hash-worker bot force-pushed the deps/js/major-eslint-npm-packages branch from fb88e42 to 12b61c9 Compare March 9, 2025 23:12
hashdotai
hashdotai previously approved these changes Mar 9, 2025
View reviewed changes
@hash-worker hash-worker bot force-pushed the deps/js/major-eslint-npm-packages branch from 509a366 to 85678b3 Compare July 11, 2025 22:17
@hash-worker hash-worker bot force-pushed the deps/js/major-eslint-npm-packages branch from 85678b3 to a480119 Compare July 12, 2025 13:00
hashdotai
hashdotai previously approved these changes Jul 12, 2025
View reviewed changes
@hash-worker hash-worker bot force-pushed the deps/js/major-eslint-npm-packages branch from a480119 to c4b8c84 Compare July 15, 2025 05:18
hashdotai
hashdotai previously approved these changes Jul 15, 2025
View reviewed changes
@hash-worker hash-worker bot force-pushed the deps/js/major-eslint-npm-packages branch from c4b8c84 to 2905c09 Compare July 18, 2025 11:46
hashdotai
hashdotai previously approved these changes Jul 18, 2025
View reviewed changes
@hash-worker hash-worker bot force-pushed the deps/js/major-eslint-npm-packages branch from 2905c09 to f983cd3 Compare July 19, 2025 15:17
hashdotai
hashdotai previously approved these changes Jul 19, 2025
View reviewed changes
@hash-worker hash-worker bot force-pushed the deps/js/major-eslint-npm-packages branch from f983cd3 to 8f98da3 Compare July 20, 2025 11:41
hashdotai
hashdotai previously approved these changes Jul 20, 2025
View reviewed changes
@hash-worker hash-worker bot force-pushed the deps/js/major-eslint-npm-packages branch from 8f98da3 to 13502dc Compare July 25, 2025 12:59
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

representative_read_entity

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1 $$30.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 329 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.82 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1 $$29.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 332 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.832 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2 $$29.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 282 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.906 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1 $$29.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 284 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.05 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1 $$29.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 267 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.84 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1 $$29.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 298 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.276 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1 $$28.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 275 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.159 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1 $$28.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 307 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.837 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1 $$30.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 318 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.121 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 10000 entities $$21.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 148 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.149 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1000 entities $$14.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 85.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.206 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1 entities $$14.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 83.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.676 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$14.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 74.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.162 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 100 entities $$13.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 65.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.234 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 1 entities $$55.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 371 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.792 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 50 entities $$353 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.78 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.654 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$102 \mathrm{ms} \pm 398 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.025 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 25 entities $$140 \mathrm{ms} \pm 962 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-44.111 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 5 entities $$65.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 870 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.52 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 1 entities $$14.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 93.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.287 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 50 entities $$17.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 161 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.412 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$15.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 101 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.18 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 25 entities $$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 91.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.616 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 5 entities $$14.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 95.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.85 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba $$8.73 \mathrm{ms} \pm 39.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.009 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$258 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.88 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.233 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2 $$231 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.48 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.282 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255 $$275 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.40 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.207 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0 $$186 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.07 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.122 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2 $$244 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.00 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.196 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$250 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.24 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-1.139 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$129 \mathrm{ms} \pm 913 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.019 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2 $$106 \mathrm{ms} \pm 636 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.058 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255 $$148 \mathrm{ms} \pm 998 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.891 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0 $$98.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 746 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.859 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2 $$115 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.18 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.398 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$123 \mathrm{ms} \pm 905 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.973 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@hashdotai hashdotai hashdotai approved these changes

Assignees

@CiaranMn CiaranMn

Labels
area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) type/eng > backend Owned by the @backend team type/eng > frontend Owned by the @frontend team
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@hashdotai @CiaranMn