Skip to content

[CI][NFC] Clarify the breaking of the opportunistic_group #19774

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

steffenlarsen
Copy link
Contributor

This clarifies the break of sycl-rel 6.2 opportunistic_group test due to the removal of the corresponding device aspect in #19238 following the refactoring of the experimental extension.

This clarifies the break of sycl-rel 6.2 opportunistic_group test due to
the removal of the corresponding device aspect in intel#19238
following the refactoring of the experimental extension.

Signed-off-by: Larsen, Steffen <steffen.larsen@intel.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@aelovikov-intel aelovikov-intel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I forgot to ask in previous PR... This needs to be moved to before line 15 too.

@steffenlarsen
Copy link
Contributor Author

I forgot to ask in previous PR... This needs to be moved to before line 15 too.

Sure! The other PR isn't merged yet either, so I will go change it. For the future, might it be better to make the need for a approval/clarification on each of those lines? Having to move these into the same place is going to cause all incoming clarifications to conflict.

Signed-off-by: Larsen, Steffen <steffen.larsen@intel.com>
@aelovikov-intel
Copy link
Contributor

The expectation is that going forward we won't need to make it post-factum, so there will be no section in the file, everything will be solid/containing necessary explanations.

@steffenlarsen steffenlarsen merged commit a69ec83 into intel:sycl Aug 15, 2025
24 checks passed
@steffenlarsen steffenlarsen deleted the steffen/clarify_opp_group_break branch August 15, 2025 08:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants