Skip to content

[lldb][Expression][NFC] Make LoadAddressResolver::m_target a reference #149490

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 18, 2025

Conversation

Michael137
Copy link
Member

The only place that passes a target to LoadAddressResolver already checks for pointer validity. And inside of the resolver we have been dereferencing the target anyway without nullptr checks. So codify the non-nullness of m_target by making it a reference.

The only place that passes a target to `LoadAddressResolver` already
checks for pointer validity. And inside of the resolver we have been
dereferencing the target anyway without nullptr checks. So codify the
non-nullness of `m_target` by making it a reference.
@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Jul 18, 2025

@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb

Author: Michael Buch (Michael137)

Changes

The only place that passes a target to LoadAddressResolver already checks for pointer validity. And inside of the resolver we have been dereferencing the target anyway without nullptr checks. So codify the non-nullness of m_target by making it a reference.


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149490.diff

1 Files Affected:

  • (modified) lldb/source/Expression/IRExecutionUnit.cpp (+8-8)
diff --git a/lldb/source/Expression/IRExecutionUnit.cpp b/lldb/source/Expression/IRExecutionUnit.cpp
index e445fa8833022..6f812b91a8b1d 100644
--- a/lldb/source/Expression/IRExecutionUnit.cpp
+++ b/lldb/source/Expression/IRExecutionUnit.cpp
@@ -700,7 +700,7 @@ void IRExecutionUnit::CollectCandidateCPlusPlusNames(
 
 class LoadAddressResolver {
 public:
-  LoadAddressResolver(Target *target, bool &symbol_was_missing_weak)
+  LoadAddressResolver(Target &target, bool &symbol_was_missing_weak)
       : m_target(target), m_symbol_was_missing_weak(symbol_was_missing_weak) {}
 
   std::optional<lldb::addr_t> Resolve(SymbolContextList &sc_list) {
@@ -722,11 +722,11 @@ class LoadAddressResolver {
 
       // First try the symbol.
       if (candidate_sc.symbol) {
-        load_address = candidate_sc.symbol->ResolveCallableAddress(*m_target);
+        load_address = candidate_sc.symbol->ResolveCallableAddress(m_target);
         if (load_address == LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS) {
           Address addr = candidate_sc.symbol->GetAddress();
-          load_address = m_target->GetProcessSP()
-                             ? addr.GetLoadAddress(m_target)
+          load_address = m_target.GetProcessSP()
+                             ? addr.GetLoadAddress(&m_target)
                              : addr.GetFileAddress();
         }
       }
@@ -734,8 +734,8 @@ class LoadAddressResolver {
       // If that didn't work, try the function.
       if (load_address == LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS && candidate_sc.function) {
         Address addr = candidate_sc.function->GetAddress();
-        load_address = m_target->GetProcessSP() ? addr.GetLoadAddress(m_target)
-                                                : addr.GetFileAddress();
+        load_address = m_target.GetProcessSP() ? addr.GetLoadAddress(&m_target)
+                                               : addr.GetFileAddress();
       }
 
       // We found a load address.
@@ -766,7 +766,7 @@ class LoadAddressResolver {
   }
 
 private:
-  Target *m_target;
+  Target &m_target;
   bool &m_symbol_was_missing_weak;
   lldb::addr_t m_best_internal_load_address = LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS;
 };
@@ -790,7 +790,7 @@ IRExecutionUnit::FindInSymbols(const std::vector<ConstString> &names,
   for (size_t i = 0; i < m_preferred_modules.GetSize(); ++i)
     non_local_images.Remove(m_preferred_modules.GetModuleAtIndex(i));
 
-  LoadAddressResolver resolver(target, symbol_was_missing_weak);
+  LoadAddressResolver resolver(*target, symbol_was_missing_weak);
 
   ModuleFunctionSearchOptions function_options;
   function_options.include_symbols = true;

Copy link
Collaborator

@DavidSpickett DavidSpickett left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Michael137 Michael137 merged commit 03b7766 into llvm:main Jul 18, 2025
11 checks passed
@Michael137 Michael137 deleted the lldb/irexecutionunit-target-ref branch July 18, 2025 13:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants