forked from python/cpython
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
[WIP] Review PR for async state introspection protocol #1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
ncoghlan
wants to merge
3
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
bpo-31230-async-op-introspection
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ncoghlan
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 4, 2017
* Added support for CAN_ISOTP protocol * Added unit tests for CAN ISOTP * Updated documentation for ISO-TP protocol * Removed trailing whitespace in documentation * Added blurb NEWS.d file * updated Misc/ACKS * Fixed broken unit test that was using isotp const outside of skippable section * Removed dependecy over third party project * Added implementation for getsockname + unit tests * Missing newline at end of ACKS file * Accidentally inserted a type in ACKS file * Followed tiran changes review #1 recommendations * Added spaces after comma
ncoghlan
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 28, 2020
``` Direct leak of 8 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x7f008bf19667 in __interceptor_malloc (/lib64/libasan.so.6+0xb0667) #1 0x7f007a0bee4a in subprocess_fork_exec /home/heimes/dev/python/cpython/Modules/_posixsubprocess.c:774 #2 0xe0305b in cfunction_call Objects/methodobject.c:546 ``` Signed-off-by: Christian Heimes <christian@python.org>
ncoghlan
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 12, 2020
* bpo-40791: Make compare_digest more constant-time. The existing volatile `left`/`right` pointers guarantee that the reads will all occur, but does not guarantee that they will be _used_. So a compiler can still short-circuit the loop, saving e.g. the overhead of doing the xors and especially the overhead of the data dependency between `result` and the reads. That would change performance depending on where the first unequal byte occurs. This change removes that optimization. (This is change #1 from https://bugs.python.org/issue40791 .)
This PR is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity. |
ncoghlan
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 6, 2022
) Fix test_gdb.test_pycfunction() for Python built with clang -Og. Tolerate inlined functions in the gdb traceback. When _testcapimodule.c is built by clang -Og, _null_to_none() is inlined in meth_varargs() and so gdb returns _null_to_none() as the frame #1. If it's not inlined, meth_varargs() is the frame #1.
ncoghlan
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 19, 2022
…python#91466) Fix an uninitialized bool in exception print context. `struct exception_print_context.need_close` was uninitialized. Found by oss-fuzz in a test case running under the undefined behavior sanitizer. https://oss-fuzz.com/testcase-detail/6217746058182656 ``` Python/pythonrun.c:1241:28: runtime error: load of value 253, which is not a valid value for type 'bool' #0 0xbf2203 in print_chained cpython3/Python/pythonrun.c:1241:28 #1 0xbea4bb in print_exception_cause_and_context cpython3/Python/pythonrun.c:1320:19 #2 0xbea4bb in print_exception_recursive cpython3/Python/pythonrun.c:1470:13 #3 0xbe9e39 in _PyErr_Display cpython3/Python/pythonrun.c:1517:9 ``` Pretty obvious what the ommission was upon code inspection.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a work-in-progress local PR for https://bugs.python.org/issue31230 to avoid creating review noise in the main CPython repo.