-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 457
run: Support system signal as a coverage report dump trigger. #1998
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
35233a5
run: Support system signal as a coverage report dump trigger.
ark-g cd2a914
misc: Changes per pull request
ark-g b4f3467
docs: Update - save signal doesn't work on Windows
ark-g 0858fb0
simplify and test --save-signal handling
nedbat b2b23c4
Merge branch 'master' into nedbat/more-1998
nedbat 5d0acca
test: Add test cases for signal dump
ark-g a89c789
test: a test for --save-signal
nedbat 3f8ef2f
Merge pull request #1 from nedbat/nedbat/more-1998
ark-g 824e788
Merge branch 'master' into master
ark-g f3bcee1
test: Rename send signal test functons
ark-g ed22d06
Update signal test functions
ark-g 31920ff
test: Remove redundant test
ark-g ce9dfe9
docs: Fix docs
ark-g File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think maybe we don't need this test since
test_save_signal
covers it? Same fortest_save_signal_kill
, though maybe there's some subtlety I'm overlooking?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In general I agree, but the
test_save_signal_usr1
is more precise and check conditions more tight, so I would leave it. Regardingtest_save_signal_kill
I will remove it since looks like we're both agree that it is redundant.