Skip to content

Conversation

dswij
Copy link
Member

@dswij dswij commented Oct 7, 2021

Closes #7764

Make shadow_reuse suggestion less verbose.

changelog: [shadow_reuse] does not warn shadowing statement

@rust-highfive
Copy link

r? @flip1995

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Oct 7, 2021
@dswij dswij force-pushed the shadow-unrelated-block branch from 5bfdf18 to 64f8b9d Compare October 7, 2021 08:50
@flip1995
Copy link
Member

flip1995 commented Oct 7, 2021

@bors r+

Thanks!

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 7, 2021

📌 Commit 64f8b9d has been approved by flip1995

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 7, 2021

⌛ Testing commit 64f8b9d with merge 872f321...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 7, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test
Approved by: flip1995
Pushing 872f321 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 872f321 into rust-lang:master Oct 7, 2021
@dswij dswij deleted the shadow-unrelated-block branch September 8, 2022 15:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

shadow_unrelated: entire match statement in warning instead of just var name
4 participants