cleanup: Unify find_use_placement approaches. #94941
Description
Spawned off of: #94584 (comment)
The code for find_use_placement was at one point roughly the same as the algorithm used prior to PR #94584.
PR #94584 changed things to use a more robust algorithm. But it didn't handle the find_use_placement code.
The two could be brought into sync, as documented in a FIXME
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
Area: Messages for errors, warnings, and lintsCall for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue.Call for participation: This issue has a mentor. Use #t-compiler/help on Zulip for discussion.Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.