Skip to content

New useSharedAsyncIter hook #87

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Feb 7, 2025
Merged

New useSharedAsyncIter hook #87

merged 15 commits into from
Feb 7, 2025

Conversation

shtaif
Copy link
Owner

@shtaif shtaif commented Feb 6, 2025

No description provided.

@shtaif shtaif self-assigned this Feb 6, 2025
@shtaif shtaif force-pushed the use-shared-async-iter branch 3 times, most recently from d5f5318 to ca08e1c Compare February 7, 2025 14:03
@shtaif shtaif force-pushed the use-shared-async-iter branch from ca08e1c to 0da5b0e Compare February 7, 2025 14:06
@shtaif shtaif force-pushed the use-shared-async-iter branch from 8042ec0 to 19ff59b Compare February 7, 2025 14:33
@shtaif shtaif force-pushed the use-shared-async-iter branch from 19ff59b to e73d734 Compare February 7, 2025 14:35
@shtaif shtaif marked this pull request as ready for review February 7, 2025 14:36
@shtaif shtaif merged commit b1568b5 into master Feb 7, 2025
7 checks passed
@shtaif shtaif deleted the use-shared-async-iter branch February 7, 2025 14:38
shtaif pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 7, 2025
## [0.10.0](v0.9.2...v0.10.0) (2025-02-07)

### Features

* new `useSharedAsyncIter` hook ([#87](#87)) ([b1568b5](b1568b5))

### Documentation

* **readme:** add license badge ([#86](#86)) ([e5e94dd](e5e94dd))
* **readme:** fix StackBlitz link adjacent text ([#84](#84)) ([08cd00b](08cd00b))
* **readme:** various edits ([#81](#81)) ([2c34532](2c34532))
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2025

🎉 This PR is included in version 0.10.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant