Skip to content

Jv performance tests for locking process baselines #16344

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

JoukoVirtanen
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Scripts used for performance testing of locking process baselines. This is a bit of a mess at the moment and I am not sure if this will ever be merged.

User-facing documentation

Testing and quality

  • the change is production ready: the change is GA, or otherwise the functionality is gated by a feature flag
  • CI results are inspected

Automated testing

  • added unit tests
  • added e2e tests
  • added regression tests
  • added compatibility tests
  • modified existing tests

How I validated my change

change me!

@JoukoVirtanen JoukoVirtanen added the do-not-merge A change which is not meant to be merged label Aug 7, 2025
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 7, 2025

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@rhacs-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Images are ready for the commit at 52e9a4e.

To use with deploy scripts, first export MAIN_IMAGE_TAG=4.9.x-379-g52e9a4e75d.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 7, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 49.16%. Comparing base (5493ce6) to head (52e9a4e).
⚠️ Report is 76 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #16344      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   48.86%   49.16%   +0.29%     
==========================================
  Files        2611     2631      +20     
  Lines      192942   194817    +1875     
==========================================
+ Hits        94284    95773    +1489     
- Misses      91235    91562     +327     
- Partials     7423     7482      +59     
Flag Coverage Δ
go-unit-tests 49.16% <ø> (+0.29%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
do-not-merge/work-in-progress do-not-merge A change which is not meant to be merged
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants