Skip to content

chore: ref to SN Monorepo on gasless tx page #50

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

nadeemb53
Copy link
Member

  • link to status network monorepo added

@nadeemb53 nadeemb53 requested review from pajicf and 0xcyp and removed request for pajicf August 21, 2025 05:38
@0xcyp
Copy link
Contributor

0xcyp commented Aug 22, 2025

@nadeemb53 is it mostly living here: https://github.com/status-im/status-network-monorepo/tree/develop/besu-plugins/linea-sequencer/sequencer/src/main/rust/rln_bridge ?

or better just to point to the global monorepo as there are multiple files spread everywhere?

i'm just worried someone interested just by the gasless module would not find it in the whole monorepo without help (from the readme for example)

@nadeemb53
Copy link
Member Author

better just to point to the global monorepo as there are multiple files spread everywhere?

There are many files and it's a collection of multiple components to build this feature

i'm just worried someone interested just by the gasless module would not find it in the whole monorepo without help (from the readme for example)

Maybe its better to add a section in the readme pointing to a few key components and linking that section of the readme in the docs?

@pajicf
Copy link
Member

pajicf commented Aug 22, 2025

better just to point to the global monorepo as there are multiple files spread everywhere?

There are many files and it's a collection of multiple components to build this feature

i'm just worried someone interested just by the gasless module would not find it in the whole monorepo without help (from the readme for example)

Maybe its better to add a section in the readme pointing to a few key components and linking that section of the readme in the docs?

Seems like natural thing for the README of the monorepo instead. I agree with this approach

@yjkellyjoo
Copy link

yjkellyjoo commented Aug 22, 2025

i'm just worried someone interested just by the gasless module would not find it in the whole monorepo without help (from the readme for example)

Maybe its better to add a section in the readme pointing to a few key components and linking that section of the readme in the docs?

Got it, will keep this in mind with the new readme structure

@yjkellyjoo
Copy link

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants