[5.9] Destinations: pass -Xfrontend -validate-tbd-against-ir=none
#6378
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This fixes an issue with the Windows build highlighted in #6361 (comment)
MaxDesiatov
requested review from
abertelrud,
neonichu and
tomerd
as code owners
MaxDesiatov
changed the title
-Xfrontend -validate-tbd-against-ir=none-Xfrontend -validate-tbd-against-ir=none
|
@swift-ci smoke test |
|
Per a discussion with @compnerd, this is more desirable on Windows that disabling the command altogether and is an acceptable workaround until the compiler bug is fixed. |
|
gotcha. #6377 (comment) |
|
@compnerd given that swiftlang/swift#64973 was merged, can this one be closed then? |
|
Yeah, I think that we should be good here. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This fixes an issue with the Windows build introduced with the conversion of
SwiftDestinationTooltoAsyncParsableCommand, as reported at #6361 (comment)