Skip to content

Conversation

Verbjimtim
Copy link
Contributor

Description of changes

Changes to Australian Positions and Identifiers within the YBBB FIR.

Reallocated sector groupings in the Brisbane FIR.
Added sector definition and identifier for YASH
Added sector definition and identifier for YWIL
Fixed AYPM being marked as oceanic

Reason and motivation

Keeping the positions up to date with the internal VATPAC dataset.
Re-made PR based off #970 due conflicts.

Approved contributior?

  • I am on the approved contributers list
  • I have sent an request by email to get approved
  • Someone on the approved contributer list will review this request

@Verbjimtim Verbjimtim changed the title 25VATPAC 2505 sector audio VATPAC 2505 sector audio May 20, 2025
@Slep-wt
Copy link
Contributor

Slep-wt commented May 20, 2025

Changes are good to me. Just resubmitted the PR because of an excess of conflicts.

@Verbjimtim Verbjimtim changed the title VATPAC 2505 sector audio VATPAC 2505 sector audit May 23, 2025
@daniluk4000
Copy link
Collaborator

Quality job, as always.

But I would fix those labels, current it's not clear what sector they belong to. It this is intended, LGTM

image

image

Copy link
Collaborator

@daniluk4000 daniluk4000 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Verify labels positions

@Slep-wt
Copy link
Contributor

Slep-wt commented Jun 4, 2025

Quality job, as always.

But I would fix those labels, current it's not clear what sector they belong to. It this is intended, LGTM

image

image

Hi Danila - Yep this label placement is intended. The group sector labels are inherited from their primary sector, so will be offset to wherever they are.

@Verbjimtim
Copy link
Contributor Author

The only one I'd disagree with is I'll move TRT (cause currently partially appears in TRS)

@Verbjimtim
Copy link
Contributor Author

otherwise LGTM, send it

@Adrian2k Adrian2k merged commit 0af5ed9 into vatsimnetwork:master Jun 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants