feat(core): add some DSC fields to transaction envelope headers #869
+75
−8
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## lcian/feat/envelope-headers/accessors #869 +/- ##
=========================================================================
+ Coverage 72.36% 72.98% +0.62%
=========================================================================
Files 64 64
Lines 7324 7337 +13
=========================================================================
+ Hits 5300 5355 +55
+ Misses 2024 1982 -42 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
lcian
commented
Jul 24, 2025
lcian
force-pushed
the
lcian/feat/dsc-info-for-transactions
branch
from
41e40a1 to
e1a1c7e
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds the necessary DSC fields to solve the metrics extrapolation issue.
Close #865